° I see your point. Netflix is all very well and good, but how to select from 20,000 offerings that one you wish to view?
° My quandary last weekend was even worse, because it was my quandary. 10 flicks opening in Overton. 10. At least two days' worth, and me with only a single August afternoon to while away . . . .
° Exorcist: The Beginning. No review available, no prescreening allowed. Translation: stinks so badly the distributor just hopes to sell a few tickets the first weekend. That sounds promising, I love smelly movies. But I never even saw the original film, don't remember why, but no use rethinking it now. Skip.
° Benji: Off the Leash! Three stars, really rather glowing review. Movie argues against cruelty, I myself am opposed to cruelty. Skip. (What do you mean why? Just look at the cutesy little pookypoo, just an invitation for some Big Bad Grim Wolf to inhale. Rowr!)
° Open Water. Threeandonehalfstars, really glowing review. Supposed to make Jaws look like the Three Little Fishies. Skip. (Why? The trailers and synopsis make it clear that one is fixing to watch the brinesoaked heads of two folks float in fishy water for a solid hourandahalf. Might as well film paint drying.)
° Once upon a Time in the West. Four stars, new print, big screen. Skip. Roy, Trigger, Gene, Gabby, Silver--don't care if I never see another western as long as I live; besides, I already saw this one new, on a bigger screen, in Italian, long time gone.
° The Corporation. Four stars. Skip. It's too hot for polemic, my brain just begins to melt and ooze out my left ear.
° Well there's half of 'em culled, and not a watt of brainwaveage run through the meter.
° Without a Paddle. A single star, a review so corroded with scathing bitchiness, this must be a really really bad movie. Paydirt! I quote the beginning of Chris Hewitt's opinion:
For everyone nowadays is a male chauvinist pig (vuol dire, "a postfeminist") I reckon, but me and you.
° Mr. Hewitt has guessed my values all wrong. I haven't seen a Matt Damon vehicle since Ripley. Chris O'Donnell who? But Oz, this movie has Oz, and with any luck at all he'll transform into a werewolf partway through and devour the other actors, then repent, then confess to Willow, then saddle up a convertible and head down Route 66. I'd pay good money to see Seth Green eat his costars.
° This movie, however, is playing three screens in Pope, no fieldtrip needed.
° Garden State. Three stars. Clever visual of the shirt matching the wallpaper. Lithium, Zoloft, cold turkey. Must see. I often think the entire country's been prozacked into an evolutionary deadend. I mean, how can one overcome setbacks when no setbacks can be sensed? One screen in Pope, still not worth a fieldtrip.
° A Home at the End of the World. Twoandahalfstars, damned with faint praise. Glowing reviews for Colin Farrell's characterisation. Shocked reactions to the ubiquitous drug usage and general sexual and psychological screwedupness--o this is a must see. Won't come to Pope at all, fieldtrip positively necessary.°
° Touch of Pink. Onestarandonehalf. " . . . a rickety little romantic comedy . . . ." Must see. It'll never come to Pope, 'cause it's a Colinless samesexer. Yet somehow Kyle MacLachlan costars as Cary Grant. Add Isabella Rossellini and it'd be Pink Velvet. Add Robert Sterling and it'd be Topper. O yes, must see.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento